How to Write an Article Review

Include the main points you will evaluate. The data contains characters, plot details, and other important points.

You can get into your review by several ways. In any case, the introduction should encourage your readers to read on. You can take an exciting quote from the book, ask a provocative question, or simply start with a strong statement.

You should also name the author, title of the article, publication date and publisher right at the beginning, as well as roughly indicate in which direction your review will move. In this way, all readers know what they are getting into. However, you should not reveal too much of the content yet to maintain curiosity.

The main part is about analyzing the book and justifying your opinion:

• What kind of style does the book have? How is it written?
• Which question is dealt with, how is it argued?
• What theses has the author put forward? Are these their own, new theses, or are only existing findings summarized?
• Is the reasoning clear and comprehensible?
• Will the question be answered?
• Is there a thematic, content-related or narrative continuity in the work?
• What is your opinion on the author’s conclusions?

In the main part, it is simply important to provide the reader with the best possible picture. After all, someone should benefit from reading your review.

In the final part, you draw your conclusion. You can summarize your main statements again and make your recommendation:

• Have any questions remained unanswered?
• For whom is the book interesting? How does it fit into a possible current discourse on the topic?
• Would you recommend the book?

Be sure to include the full citation either in a reference page or near your evaluation if writing an annotated bibliography. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.

Article reviews are texts intended for an audience that understands the topic of the article, and not for a wider readership. When writing a review of an article, one should summarize the main ideas, arguments, arguments and conclusions, as well as assess the value of the article in terms of its contribution to knowledge in this area and the effectiveness of the article as a whole. .

Reviews are not just opinions. You should use the text of the article and write a review of the author’s ideas based on it. You will respond to his arguments using your own thoughts, theories and developments. Your assessment of an article will depend on the evidence and analysis of its subject matter.

A review of an article is a response to the research material received by the author. No further research is being conducted.

A review of an article summarizes the ideas of the authors and evaluates these ideas.

Before we start, we need to think about the structure of the text. This will help you understand how to read articles to write good reviews. Your review consists of the following parts:

Summarize everything that is said in the article. Pay attention to the most important statements and assertions.

Talk about the positive aspects of the article, think about what the author did well, what arguments you could agree with and what the author noticed.

Find inconsistencies, gaps and inconsistencies in the text. Determine whether the author has sufficient grounds for conclusions. Find unanswered questions in the article.

First read the title, article excerpt, introduction, subtitle, first verse of each paragraph, conclusion. Then read the first few paragraphs and their conclusions. This allows you to get acquainted with the author’s arguments and key thoughts in the article. Then read the entire article. Imagine the big picture when you first read it. In other words, define your main ideas.

Write down words, concepts, or questions you don’t know.

Find information about unfamiliar definitions or concepts in order to fully understand the text.

Read it a second time, a third time. Use a pencil or marker to highlight key points. Highlight the main thoughts and facts on which they are based.

Connect the information obtained in the article with knowledge of the topic. Think about what you discussed in class and think about other articles you have read. Does this article contradict what you already know? Are you expanding your knowledge on this topic? Decide if this text is similar or different from any other text you have read on the topic.

Pay particular attention to the nature of the article. Make sure you understand the text. Understanding of the article is the basis for competent peer review.

This can be done in free text format or point by point. Start retelling the article in your own words. It focuses on the author’s arguments, research, and statements. Include all key points. It is important to convey all the information accurately.

Whichever method you choose, list the main points of the article and research, or the arguments that support them. This section should be a list of what the author has written and should not be your opinion of that information.

Retell the article and decide what you want to comment on in the review. You can focus on the theoretical approach, content, presentation or analysis, and the style of the information. Of course you have to explain the nature of the article, but you can also look at other aspects. This is especially useful if you want to link an overview to learning materials.

Read the draft again and remove unnecessary information, erase less important details.

to determine if the author expresses his thoughts clearly and unambiguously throughout. List any weaknesses in the article and mention any new discoveries in this area. The strength of an article can be a clear analysis of a particular problem. The weakness may be that the author in the article does not provide a solution and does not provide new information. See examples and links. The article may incorrectly cite data from a well-known study. Note this observation and look for evidence that you are right. Answer the following questions:

1. What is the purpose of the article?
2. What are the rationales and underlying assumptions?
3. Are the key concepts clearly defined?
4. How important are the facts?
5. Where is this article in the literature on this subject?
6. Does the article expand your existing knowledge about the problem?
7. How clearly does the writer write?