The Connection Between Critical Thinking And Criminal Justice

Critical thinking is essential while attempting to come up with a suitable reaction to a situation in a range of vocations, including but not limited to Justice/Human services, and failing to do so may result in a variety of issues. There are several instances when critical thinking was actively used—or not—during a circumstance that called for more attention to detail. It is reasonable to conclude that critical thinking is a valuable talent to possess when dealing with issues that are complicated and lack a simple solution.

I’ll start with the story of the guy who left a fender-bender in Seattle in 2018 as my first illustration (Chavez & Toropin. 2020). One of the man’s acquaintances was informed by a Seattle police officer that the lady involved in the collision was in severe condition and may not have survived. A cunning effort to get the driver to admit (Chavez & Toropin. 2020). According to a report from the Office of Police Accountability at the Seattle Police Department, the driver’s friends said that he became concerned in the days after the collision, believing that someone may have perished in the collision (Chavez & Toropin. 2020). The guy committed himself over the event less than a week after it happened (Chavez & Toropin. 2020).

The second illustration is the Ontario city of Belleville’s need to handle its mental health issue (Bertrim, 2020). The Belleville police obtained health IM mobile technology in late October 2019, which enables them to speak with triage nurses to gain guidance and choose the best course of action (Bertrim, 2020). The tool enables police to choose the ideal setting for a person in need. The technology, for instance, “alerts the triage nurse in advance transmitting crucial mental health information and thus helps the health care personnel plan to give more prompt treatment (Bertrim, 2020)” if a trip to the emergency department is necessary. According to the report, given that Canada is experiencing a mental health crisis, the program has subsequently been implemented in at least 30 other police departments in Ontario, as well as several in the Prairies and British Columbia (Bertrim, 2020).

Last but not least, I’ll provide a very personal example: the May 2019 launch of The Watch in Lethbridge, Alberta (LPS, 2019). an initiative to promote community safety in the downtown area that involves mostly volunteers monitoring the streets (LPS, 2019). Volunteers on watch patrol are on duty from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. seven days a week throughout the year to act as eyes and ears to link residents with the proper response from law enforcement, emergency medical services, and fire departments (LPS, 2019). Giving directions, first treatment, tourist information, and other help to anybody in need is also a responsibility of volunteers (LPS, 2019).

When it comes to critical thinking as it pertains to the justice industry, all three essays are essentially identical. Beyond the exposition of the main ideas, all three of them illustrated how critical thinking may take many different turns. In the first article, a police officer’s brilliant plan to persuade a driver to speak up about a minor collision that quickly descended into hostility was executed. The conclusion that was expected—the man’s suicide and no confession—was not what happened. I don’t believe the officer intended to hurt him in any way other than to compel him to report the event. Is it a coincidence that the police, out of all the people in Seattle, told the man’s companion that the lady involved in the crash “was in serious condition”? With that stated, it’s also concerning that, if the man’s buddy gave him false information to get a confession, the friend was ignorant of the man’s mental health and failed to seek treatment or induce a confession.

As we get into the second story, it becomes clear that medical IM device technology was required to address the worsening mental health issue in that neighborhood. It was a brilliant concept to use technology, which is a rapidly expanding sector of the economy, to discover a new method to instantly link cops and triage nurses. The drawback is that although technology may not always be dependable, it is very effective at making an officer’s work simpler on mental health calls since a triage nurse is always available and has quick responses.

The Watch is a show that was critically regarded, as a final point. Everything was addressed through questions and answers, including worries about the budget, volunteer safety, and clothes. Even though this software was well planned out, problems yet arose. What was going to happen when winter arrived, given the degree of control we had in such circumstances? There were bound to be hiccups since The Watch was a brand-new program. The introduction of this program to lessen crime in the downtown area and increase public safety in a manner that gave back to the community by using volunteers was its most important component.

The area of justice benefits from critical thinking since it enables concerns to be addressed with a variety of questions in order to find the best course of action. Justice professionals must already have the talent or be able to develop it via training or knowledge in order to apply critical thinking. I think all the works I described employed critical thinking to resolve a problem, however the first incident’s choice went horrifically wrong, whilst the latter two had successful resolutions.

The crucial process of critical thinking focuses on finding the best solution to a problem. The basis for critical thinking is having questions to determine what needs to be considered since not all problems have straightforward solutions. Critical thinking is particularly essential in the justice sector because of the advancement of technology and the need to give situations more consideration before acting. The works shown make it very evident that critical thinking sometimes results in the intended result but not always.